X-Sympa-To: patents
Return-Path: <pelegrin@labri.fr>
Delivered-To: patents@aful.org
Received: from iona.labri.fr (iona.labri.fr [147.210.8.143])
	by stabilite.aful.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A4DA4E81
	for <patents@aful.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2005 23:07:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by iona.labri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396121017A5
	for <patents@aful.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2005 23:04:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from iona.labri.fr ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (iona.labri.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 12546-03 for <patents@aful.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2005 23:04:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [147.210.20.11] (brol.labri.fr [147.210.20.11])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by iona.labri.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB29101765
	for <patents@aful.org>; Mon,  6 Jun 2005 23:04:52 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <42A4BAE8.3020103@labri.fr>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 23:06:48 +0200
From: Francois PELLEGRINI <pelegrin@labri.fr>
Organization: LaBRI, Universite Bordeaux I
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804
X-Accept-Language: fr, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Patent Forum <patents@aful.org>
Subject: The Indian software patent bill
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at labri.fr
X-Validation-by: pelegrin@labri.fr


Here are some references, including the bill itself.

http://www.lexorbis.com/Article.pdf
http://www.lexorbis.com/patents.pdf

The wording of the analysis paper regarding
software patents seems quite confusing to me.


				f.p.

