[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

From: PILCH Hartmut <phm@a2e.de>
To: Francois PELLEGRINI <pelegrin@labri.fr>
Cc: patents@aful.org
Subject: Re: [Patents] Lessig on Property
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:31:37 +0200

> >A while ago I had some public discussions with RMS in which I said
> >there was nothing wrong with the notion of "intellectual property" and
> >that it could indeed be an enlightening notion if put into the proper
> >context. I also said that software patents should be seen as a
> >dysfunctional (non-performant) set of rules for turning intellectual
> >achievements into (virtual) property objects.
>
> This is misleading. Patents and Copyright are no property
> at all.

I'm afraid you didn't care to read Lessig's text, nor mine.

Lessig on Property, PILCH Hartmut
- Re: [Patents] Lessig on Property, mag
  - Re: [Patents] Lessig on Property, PILCH Hartmut
- Re: [Patents] Lessig on Property, Francois PELLEGRINI
  - Re: [Patents] Lessig on Property, PILCH Hartmut

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)