X-Sympa-To: patents
Return-Path: <rms@gnu.org>
Delivered-To: patents@aful.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164])
	by stabilite.aful.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05BEAC924
	for <patents@aful.org>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 06:02:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DsuBN-0002U6-OO; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 23:14:41 -0400
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
To: mag <mag@bunuel.tii.matav.hu>
Cc: phm@a2e.de, patents@aful.org
In-reply-to: <1121278426.28840.58.camel@kusturica> (message from mag on Wed,
	13 Jul 2005 20:13:45 +0200)
Subject: Re: [Patents] Gregnews: US report proves EP lies
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
References: <20050713170738.GA14586@a2e.de> <1121278426.28840.58.camel@kusturica>
Message-Id: <E1DsuBN-0002U6-OO@fencepost.gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 23:14:41 -0400
X-Validation-by: rms@gnu.org

    I guess "Information Technology" would have a place at
    http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html , I was surprised not
    to find it there yet.

I hesitate to say that the term is inherently misleading
just because someone is making a silly semantic argument about it.

