[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Russell McOrmond <russell@flora.ca>
- To: PILCH Hartmut <phm@a2e.de>
- Cc: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>, mag <mag@bunuel.tii.matav.hu>, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Patents] Gregnews: US report proves EP lies
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:04:20 -0400
PILCH Hartmut wrote:
I guess "Information Technology" would have a place at
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html , I was surprised not
to find it there yet.
I hesitate to say that the term is inherently misleading
just because someone is making a silly semantic argument about it.
There seems to be an ambiguity in what terms like "technology" and
"engineering" mean.
I also believe there is ambiguity of what "software" is as well. Is
it a technology itself, or is it a series of logical instructions used
to control technology?
I've had this conversation with friends who are in "software
engineering" programs at University. I suggest to them that since
software is more a social science than a natural science, the field of
software doesn't really belong in engineering at all. Maybe some
combination of a math-arts degree? If you are a follower of Lessig like
I am, you might believe that software is best analyzed as a form of
privately authored law -- with law still being an arts degree.
At least the "computer science" degree I took was more appropriately
vague as to what type of science the software component was.
I guess to me that we need to restore patent law, a form of economic
public policy, to being analyzed as economic public policy. The
wordsmithing of extremists like Greg are largely irrelevant to the
discussion of whether the existence of patents in the field of software
helps or harms innovation. Only economic studies are useful for this,
and pretty much every study I have read suggests they are a chill and
not an incentive for innovation.
Other subject matter will be different, so comparing the entirely
unrelated field of computer hardware to software to indicate something
about patentability is just "social engineering".
--
Russell McOrmond, Internet Consultant: <http://www.flora.ca/>
1800+ Canadians oppose Bill C-60 which protects antiquated Recording,
Motion Picture and "software manufacturing" industries from change...
http://KillBillC60.ca Sign--> http://digital-copyright.ca/petition/
Re: [Patents] Gregnews: US report proves EP lies,
PILCH Hartmut
Re: [Patents] Gregnews: US report proves EP lies,
PILCH Hartmut
Re: [Patents] Gregnews: US report proves EP lies,
Bernard Lang
Re: [Patents] Gregnews: US report proves EP lies,
Russell McOrmond
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)