[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: paul@wolfbone.ath.cx
- To: patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: Re: Gregnews: US report proves EP lies
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:46:19 +0200 (CEST)
> This NEW BRANCH of science has experienced remarkable growth in recent
> years.
> To fight such patents in Europe is to fight the progress of a new
> science in Europe.
Hmmm...
Econophysics is a very interesting branch of condensed matter physics ;-) and
very respectable too: http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/P/cd/d15a/d1520.pdf but -
as anyone who knows something about modern physics could tell you - however
close the mathematical analogies it doesn't mean it /is/ thermodynamics:
> The movement and exchange of such goods is little different than
> the movement and exchange of energy in interacting particle systems. In
> both cases, thermodynamics ignores the microscopic interactions and focuses
> instead on macroscopic properties. It is not surprising then that
> physicists are successfully able to apply this physics to financial
> markets (indeed, Wall Street hires tons of physicists).
or that its applications are anything like those of mathematically analagous
fields and it certainly does not follow that:
> a good way to promote the disclosure of new, useful applications of
> a science is with patents.
I think we should at least wait until the econophysical models themselves
tell us that they ought to be patentable.
- Re: [Patents] Gregnews: US report proves EP lies, (continued)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)