[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'stef@zoomata.com' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/10/technology/10blue.html?emc=eta1

Interesting reading, especially since the reporter identifies Open
Source with IBM :)  I would add that this is one of the reasons FSFs
insist on using the term 'Free Software' and its translations.

Going into the content of the article, what do you think of such
efforts?  Pure waste of time and money or can this be a piece of an
answer to the bad-patent proliferation?  

bye
stef




(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)