[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe@ugent.be>
- To: Liste de diffusion Aful - Patents <patents@aful.org>
- Subject: Commission Cheats European SMEs in Patent Consultation
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:26:11 +0200
PRESS RELEASE -- [ Europe / Economy / ICT ]
========================================================================
Commission Cheats European SMEs in Patent Consultation
========================================================================
Brussels, 10 July 2006 - The Commission made an undercover move to
get more "useful" answers following the 12 April closing date of its
Patent Policy consultation. It sought out small firms across Europe
who had used the patent system. It then provided these firms with
new documentation and specialist assistance to help them write
individual answers. None of the firms answering the online
consultation got this help. But when the software firms in this new
group came to the same conclusions as the FFII, the Commission
concluded that these firms were "lacking knowledge about the patent
system".
FFII researcher Benjamin Henrion, who uncovered the facts says, "The
Commission published its procedures for the consultation, and on this
basis many hundreds of people invested time and money to answer. At
the FFII we invested several hundred man days to prepare a collective
answer supported by over a thousand SMEs. Now we learn that the
Commission changed the rules, after the close of the consultation."
"It selected over 600 SMEs who were known to hold patents or be
involved in patent litigation, and helped them to answer by providing
expert assistance. Finally, it discounted our collective answers,
and promoted its own SME answers", he continues. FFII president
Pieter Hintjens adds: "If the Commission wanted to delay the
proceedings to get more SME input, it should have followed our
recommendations."
During the consultation, the FFII documented many faults with the
consultation in an open letter, and made suggestions for fixing
these. Hintjens continues: "The Commission's behaviour is
inconsistent with its pretended role as a neutral party. It puts a
strong shadow over the credibility of the consultation procedure and
any results the Commission may announce."
Ironically, the responses from the Commission's ICT SME sample
nevertheless match the FFII's conclusion. They see the danger of
software patents being legalized European-wide by the back door via
both the Community Patent and the EPLA initiatives. The Commission
however discredits this opinion by claiming these SMEs lack
understanding of the patent system.
"Speaking as an SME, I'm outraged that while I had to spend huge
amounts of time trying to understand this document, some patent-
holding non-producing entity got secret financial assistance from the
Commission to write an answer" concludes Hintjens, who is also CEO of
iMatix Corporation.
========================================================================
Background information
========================================================================
The Commission contacted over 170 European Information Centres (IECs)
in over 19 countries to find the SMEs with the desired profiles
(either used or wanted to use the patent system, or have been
involved in patent litigation). They were invited to a presentation
on the topic, and later either filled in their consultation with the
help of IP specialists, or the EIC filled it on for them during a
phone interview.
========================================================================
Links
========================================================================
* Commission instructions and documentation sent to the EICs
http://wiki.ffii.org/SmePanel0607En
* FFII open letter concerning inaccessibility of the consultation
http://consultation.ffii.org/Open_Letter
* FFII patent consultation documentation
http://consultation.ffii.org/
* Permanent link to this press release
http://wiki.ffii.org/PatConsultPr060710En
========================================================================
Contact Information
========================================================================
Benjamin Henrion
FFII Brussels
+32-2-414 84 03 (fixed)
+32-484-56 61 09 (mobile)
bhenrion@ffii.org
(French/English)
========================================================================
About the FFII -- http://www.ffii.org
========================================================================
The FFII is a not-for-profit association registered in twenty European
countries, dedicated to the development of information goods for the
public benefit, based on copyright, free competition, open standards.
More than 850 members, 3,500 companies and 100,000 supporters have
entrusted the FFII to act as their voice in public policy questions
concerning exclusion rights (intellectual property) in data processing.
- Commission Cheats European SMEs in Patent Consultation, Jonas Maebe
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)