[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'ehj@ffii.org' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
I have a question regarding the proposal:

  The European Parliament would serve as the upper chamber of the EPLA
  parliament. It would not be the European Parliament as such, just the
  European Parliament acting in the function of the legislative organ of
  the EPLA treaty.
  http://a2e.de/ffii/epla/cpedu/parl/

Would then elections to the EP at the same time be elections to the EPLA++ parliament?

And, since the Commission said earlier it was illegal for member states to even participate in EPLA negotiations, would not the Commission also say that Member State Parliaments have not the competence to negotiate an EPLA++ treaty?

//Erik

(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)