Re: [Upd-discuss] SCOTUS Overrules Rigid US Appeals Court Approach to Patentability of Combinations of Existing Elements

[Michael Hart <hart@pglaf.org>]

Even though I tried to be gentle, Mr. Stallman is continuing his manipulative
strategies from over the years and even over decades to put words in mouths--
and--to continue to create more incoherence reporting the facts than there is
is the actual facts themselves.

I would strongly suggest you evaluate both Mr. Stallman's history of speeches
and online writings, as well as my own, if only to the tune of spending a ten
minute's scant reading of what we have each left in the written record.

You can find mine in the blog listed below:


Thank You!!!


Give the world eBooks in 2007!!!

Michael S. Hart
Founder
Project Gutenberg

Blog at http://hart.pglaf.org



On Wed, 2 May 2007, Richard Stallman wrote:

>    While I agree with Mr. Stallman that the written word should not be 
> patented,
>    it is probably for much deeper philosophical reasons concering the very 
> great
>    difference between copyright and patent, which Mr. Stallman did not 
> mention.
>
> Thank you for reminding the list of the reason why the term
> "intellectual property" is incoherent and must be rejected.
> (As you can see, I don't bring it up EVERY time it is relevant.
> Sometimes I leave that to you ;-).