[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
- To: "Michael S. Hart" <hart@pobox.com>
- Cc: seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org, A2K@lists.essential.org, upd-discuss@lists.essential.org, ecommerce@lists.essential.org, patents@aful.org
- Subject: Re: [Upd-discuss] SCOTUS Overrules Rigid US Appeals Court Approach to Patentability of Combinations of Existing Elements
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 11:15:32 -0400
While I agree with Mr. Stallman that the written word should not be
patented,
it is probably for much deeper philosophical reasons concering the very
great
difference between copyright and patent, which Mr. Stallman did not
mention.
Thank you for reminding the list of the reason why the term
"intellectual property" is incoherent and must be rejected.
(As you can see, I don't bring it up EVERY time it is relevant.
Sometimes I leave that to you ;-).
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)