Re: [Upd-discuss] SCOTUS Overrules Rigid US Appeals Court Approach to Patentability of Combinations of Existing Elements

[Michael Hart <hart@pglaf.org>]

On Wed, 2 May 2007, Richard Stallman wrote:

>    Even though I tried to be gentle, Mr. Stallman is continuing his 
> manipulative
>    strategies from over the years and even over decades to put words in 
> mouths--
>    and--to continue to create more incoherence reporting the facts than there 
> is
>    is the actual facts themselves.
>
> These accusations are either false or meaningless.  Your attacks are
> not even consistent with each other.  For instance, your first message
> criticized me for not mentioning the deep gulf between patent law and
> copyright law (although I talk about it frequently).  When I
> acknowledged this gulf, you attacked me for doing so.

Whenever Mr. Stallman finds himself cornered,  he resorts to "confusion"
as his way out. . .just do a search for "stallman" and the various forms
of the word confusion, confuse, confusing, etc., and  you will see these
example from over the years.

I did not "criticize you for not mentioning the deep gulf between patent
law and copyright law," and I have already corrected you once for saying
such a thing. . .if you do not discontinue, everyone in your audience is
going to find it too obvious to ignore that you are being manipulative--
even in the face of it being point out--continuing your manipulations.

If you want to quote me, please just use my words in context, as I have,
giving you far more consideration than you give me our our audience.

Do I have to remind you in public of what happened the last time I spoke
in public with you on stage in Der Waag in Amsterdam, when you did quite
much the same thing and the audience wouldn't put up with it?

Please find some other way to try to make your points!


Thank You!!!


Give the world eBooks in 2007!!!

Michael S. Hart
Founder
Project Gutenberg

Blog at http://hart.pglaf.org