[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]

(074db819ec% subtitle %074db819ec)


(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)chronological(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Thread(074db819ec% END %074db819ec) 
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Reply to sender(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) (074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)to list(074db819ec%END%074db819ec)

(074db819ec% IF user.email == 'enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it' || is_owner %074db819ec) (074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)

Seth Johnson wrote:
> (Urgent.  Send your note TODAY and CONFIRM the automatic reply from
> IETF.  You can cc campaigns@fsf.org .  Three links below, FSF's action
> page, Glyn Moody's blog, and the list announcement for TLS-AUTHZ at
> IETF.  -- Seth)

Really, the IETF is a very open community, mail flooding the main
mailing list may be quite counterproductive; why non just subscribing
and contributing to the discussion? That would actually help who is
seriously defending your position:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg55526.html

-- 
Ciao,
Enrico

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature




(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.

(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)