[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
- To: "Ivan F. Villanueva B." <ivan@ffii.org>
- Cc: Benjamin Henrion <bh@udev.org>, "patents@aful.org" <patents@aful.org>, "softwarepatents@ffii.org" <softwarepatents@ffii.org>
- Subject: Re: [Softwarepatents] [Patents] TODAY/URGENT: Stop IETF Enactment of Patented Standard for TLS
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:03:05 +0100
Ivan F. Villanueva B. wrote:
>>> This is a good opportunity to show that IETF policy is corrupted
>>> by the patent community.
>> Sure, if people think there's something wrong with the IETF, they
>> are always welcome to take part in the discussion and fix it. But
>> an email bombing is just an email bombing. What if all of the tens
>> of thousands employees of the company I work for started sending
>> emails to FFII's mailing lists arguing that s/w patents are good?
>
> AFAIK nobody was saying to ask the 100.000 supporters of the FFII to
> send an email to IETF. But if they do it, the difference is that
> people wants to express their independent opinion on the issue, they
> don't get paid by the FFII.
Actually the email I replied to in the first place was an explicit call
for action, whose first sentence read like: "Urgent. Send your note
TODAY and CONFIRM the automatic reply from IETF."
--
Ciao,
Enrico
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Softwarepatents] [Patents] TODAY/URGENT: Stop IETF Enactment of Patented Standard for TLS,
Roy Schestowitz
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)