[%TAGS (074db819ec% %074db819ec) %]
(074db819ec% IF user.email && action == 'arc' %074db819ec)
(074db819ec% END %074db819ec)
- From: Benjamin Henrion <bh@udev.org>
- To: Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
- Cc: "Ivan F. Villanueva B." <ivan@ffii.org>, "patents@aful.org" <patents@aful.org>, "softwarepatents@ffii.org" <softwarepatents@ffii.org>
- Subject: Re: [Softwarepatents] [Patents] TODAY/URGENT: Stop IETF Enactment of Patented Standard for TLS
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:43:17 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Su2ySTc3BUPHqHnrp9n+/pQJOZ7j0zR8LyA/HX1r00EXJTegyekNEeSK/apf+BKG5F sn9cB+py9PH5qnBA+nwdELoErwhZJ5/ipu4uDG10N2pqRRL+Erz2PUe9iYH6+mcdrDI5 Qdyi//6Fvmh3OVwRvvQAZvedjNy9poAdGH+Gs=
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Enrico Marocco
<enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it> wrote:
> Ivan F. Villanueva B. wrote:
>>>> AFAIK nobody was saying to ask the 100.000 supporters of the FFII
>>>> to send an email to IETF. But if they do it, the difference is
>>>> that people wants to express their independent opinion on the
>>>> issue, they don't get paid by the FFII.
>>> Actually the email I replied to in the first place was an explicit
>>> call for action, whose first sentence read like: "Urgent. Send
>>> your note TODAY and CONFIRM the automatic reply from IETF."
>>
>> I understood it as 'it would be nice if the FFII could comment on it
>> (maybe sending *1* email today)'
>
> And thus avoiding a mail flood... which is just what I asked in the
> first place.
>
> This looks quite like a kindergarten argument, I have the impression it
> is going nowhere...
FFII was considering submitting an argumentation, the problem was that
the software patent intentions of the patent owner has been censored
by IETF:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/833/
"RedPhone Security, Inc.'s statement about IPR claimed in
draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-07.txt
This IPR disclosure was removed at the submitter's request."
Do you know the reasons why it was removed?
A transparent organisation like IETF should operate in complete
transparency, and publish everything, including correspondence with
patent owners.
--
Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403
Re: [Softwarepatents] [Patents] TODAY/URGENT: Stop IETF Enactment of Patented Standard for TLS,
Roy Schestowitz
(074db819ec%|loc%074db819ec)Archive powered by(074db819ec%END%074db819ec) MhonArc 2.6.16.
(074db819ec%TAGS [% %]%074db819ec)